On Jun 8, 6:43*am, "HeyBub" <hey...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> "A side-by-side comparison of a standard flat driver's side mirror with the
> mirror designed by Dr. R. Andrew Hicks, mathematics professor at Drexel
> University. With minimal distortion, Hicks's mirror shows a much wider field
> of view. Hicks's mirror has a field of view of about 45 degrees, comparedto
> 15 to 17 degrees of view in a flat mirror."
>
> Math: Is there anything it can't do?
>
> http://phys.org/news/2012-06-math-pr...or-patent.html
>
> Of course it is illegal for the mirror to be installed by a car
> manufacturer.
>
> I blame the mirror lobby.
I blame some numb nuts for getting that same system standard on the
right side mirror. One CANNOT judge how far back a vehicle is in
those abortions of mirrors. The Europeans have had a far better
system for years. Standard flat mirror with a "wide view" portion on
the outer third.
When I look in a mirror I want to know WHERE a vehicle is, not that
one is there somewhere.
Harry K