On Jun 7, 6:45*am, ransley <Mark_Rans...@Yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 7, 1:01*am, The Daring Dufas <the-daring-du...@stinky.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Chrisgiraffe wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I've invented, patented and will be offering a new tool to the public
> > > soon. I just thought I'd give this forum the heads up. It's a one
> > > foot
> > > repeating ruler printed on clear tape that doesn't pull up the
> > > surface
> > > when removed. The printing on the tape is red and the name of the
> > > product is Red Tape.
>
> > >http://www.redtape1.com
>
> > > Sincerely,
>
> > > Chris
>
> > Very cool product, I can't wait to see some moron
> > on a job site using it to tape something like a
> > cardboard box closed or to repair a cut on an
> > extension cord.
>
> > TDD- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> "Invented" stretching the truth a bit arent you.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I think it depends on how you define "invent". For common usage I
don't think it's a stretch. Before I made a product I did research
tape, measuring devices and all similar inventions. I didn't want to
infringe on any existing patents or submit a patent when a similar
claim had been made. The patent is pending and my research suggests
that most inventions are variations on a theme. I wouldn't go so far
as to claim I invented a measuring device where none existed before.
In fact, rulers date back prior to 1500 BC (Indus Valley). More
accurate forms of measurement exists and people have gotten by without
my product without loosing a limb. But there are instances where this
simply works better than existing tools. I could not buy this product
before I produced it, thus invent really isn't too wild a claim.